By Daily Mail Reporter
Teenage girl left brain-damaged after receiving cervical cancer jab
A teenage girl has been left brain-damaged after suffering epileptic seizures just days after being given the controversial cervical cancer jab.
Stacey Jones, 18, suffered her first seizure in March when she was 17, days after she had the Cervarix injection.
In the following weeks she had several more fits, causing such severe brain injury that she had to be admitted to a rehabilitation unit, where she is relearning simple tasks.
According to the Sunday Telegraph, the parents of the teenager, from Bilston in the West Midlands, are convinced that the vaccination caused swelling in the brain.
The swelling has been diagnosed as the cause of Stacey’s neurological problems.
Mother, Julie Jones, 44, told the newspaper: ‘She was such a lovely, happy-go-lucky girl, now she is just a shell.
‘I really feel she has been used as a guinea pig.
‘I don’t think there is enough evidence that the vaccination programme is safe – this all happened days after Stacey was given the vaccine, and we don’t have any other explanation for what triggered her brain injury.’
Amid growing concern among parents about the safety of the jab, drug manufacturers insist that there is no evidence to suggest that the vaccine carries any long-term side effects.
This would suggest that the timing of Stacey’s seizures is mere coincidence rather than being linked to the vaccine.
However, a leading expert who helped develop the cancer jab today told the Sunday Express that the vaccine may be riskier and more deadly than the cancer it aims to prevent.
The doctor also claimed the jab would do nothing to lower the rates of cervical cancer in the UK.
Dr Diane Harper, who was involved in the clinical trials of Cervarix said the vaccine was being ‘over-marketed’ and parents should be warned about possible side effects.
She said: ‘All this jab will do is prevent girls getting some abnormalities associated with cervical cancer which can be treated.
‘It will not decrease cervical cancer rates at all.
By Mike Adams
Cervical cancer vaccine continues killing young girls like Natalie Morton; is pathology report a pharma cover-up?
Natalie Morton is dead. One week ago, she was an energetic and lively 14-year-old student who was just following doctor’s orders. Like all her other classmates, she believed she was dutifully protecting her health by submitting to a cervical cancer vaccine jab. But a few minutes after receiving her vaccine shot, things began to go wrong.
As one of her classmates said in a report published in the Daily Mail:
“About an hour after having the jab Natalie went really pale and wasn’t breathing. I think it was around lunchtime. She fainted in the corridor. I saw ambulance men pumping her chest then the teachers told us to go outside. A lot of people were crying afterwards and we were all very worried.”
Not surprisingly, some of Natalie’s classmates are now concerned about the safety of the vaccine:
“We have to have three of the jabs in all and a lot of us don’t want to take the rest, but they’re telling us we have to because there will be side effects if we don’t have them all.”
Did you catch that? Even after killing one of their classmates, medical doctors are still lying to these girls, telling them that if they don’t continue with all three vaccines, they will have more side effects. This, of course, is an outright lie. But it’s par for the course when it comes to vaccines.
Natalie’s mother now deeply regrets exposing her child to the vaccine that caused her death. “It’s all very, very worrying,” she said. “We feel like our children are being treated like guinea pigs. I wasn’t keen on my daughter having it in the first place but the school seemed insistent.” (Source: Daily Mail, link below.)
Blaming the girl, not the vaccine
Today, the mainstream media is reporting an obviously-fabricated explanation for her death. A pathologist is declaring that Natalie died from a “malignant chest tumor” that just coincidentally and suddenly killed her within hours after she received the cervical cancer vaccine.
This explanation is obviously a cover story to protect the vaccine industry; and it’s not even a convincing cover story at that. Natalie Morton had never been diagnosed with a chest tumor before, and she showed absolutely no symptoms of a cancer tumor. Chest tumors don’t just “lash out” and attack their hosts all of a sudden, without warning. A typical death from a cancer tumor is more often a slow, painful wasting away that can take months or years. Natalie Morton was killed in hours, and the description of her symptoms exactly matches what might be expected from an inflammatory reaction to a chemical vaccine.
But why would a pathologist cover up the true cause of Natalie Morton’s death? It’s simple: There are billions of dollars in profits at stake. Natalie’s death threatened to put the entire first-world cervical vaccination program on hold. “News of Morton’s death came shortly before U.S. health regulators again delayed a decision on whether to allow Glaxo to sell Cervarix in the United States where a panel of specialists has recommended its use,” reports Reuters.
The continuation of global cervical cancer vaccination programs — which generate billions in profits — absolutely required blaming Natalie’s death on something other than the vaccine. Blaming it on cancer is very easy to do, since every person living today has cancerous micro-tumors in their body right now. All the pathologist had to do was locate such a micro-tumor in Natalie’s body, then dismiss the vaccine altogether.