Wise Up Journal
By Gabriel O’Hara
Could similar data used to create carbon footprints we perceive be applied to other areas of humanity? How easy would it be? The answer is it would be very easy to use all kinds of data including your dusty old skin.
Wikipedia: “Nearly 1000 dust particles per square centimeter settle on domestic surfaces every hour. Some dust consists of human skin. Scientists estimate that humans shed the entire outer layer of skin every day or two, at a rate of 7 million skin flakes per minute, which corresponds to a mass emission rate of about 20 mg/minute.”
Now lets take that data and multiply it by six billion people and add a dash of Global Warming Al Gore type political speak to it. Six billion people shedding skin at 20 milligrams per minute produces 63 billion kilograms of dust per year. Spewing sixty three billion kilograms of dust into the atmosphere each and every year is not sustainable and could-possibly-maybe-might just at our current level over a few decades limit the effect of the sun’s rays and bury cities under 10 feet of dust. The land level in areas such as Egypt has increased over the last few centuries along with population growth. Ancient Egyptian structures remained under the present land level until fairly recently dug up. Dust entering the high-altitude polar winds, called circumpolar vortex, which sweeps from west to east could be the immediate cause of Africa’s drought. The world needs to come up with a sustainable solution just as important as the carbon foot-print, no less than it’s equal; a dust finger-print. Both carbon and dust taxes can help build a better richer world (for some). Last but not least, a reduction in the common population’s birth numbers is required since it is a man-made problem, in the minds of men.
Same stuff different name but it would need a massive amount of money behind this idea for a few years in order for it to seep in to the public’s mind as a reasonable doubt that it could be true or for them to repeat “it must be true because news papers and governments say so” (a technique used by a little Austrian in Germany not too long ago). Numbers are as true as multiplication and are great for promoting any agenda. Did you know in the 1970’s the public were told about the globe cooling and the establishment tried to blame it on the public’s modern life style using the same global warming rhetoric used today?
Monday, Jun, 24, 1974
Another Ice Age?
“when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing.
“Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend. The University of Wisconsin’s Reid A. Bryson and other climatologists suggest that dust and other particles released into the atmosphere as a result of farming and fuel burning may be blocking more and more sunlight from reaching and heating the surface of the earth.
“Scientists figure that only a 1% decrease in the amount of sunlight hitting the earth’s surface could tip the climatic balance, and cool the planet enough to send it sliding down the road to another ice age within only a few hundred years.
“Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds —the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world. Indeed it is the widening of this cap of cold air that is the immediate cause of Africa’s drought. By blocking moisture-bearing equatorial winds and preventing them from bringing rainfall to the parched sub-Sahara region, as well as other drought-ridden areas stretching all the way from Central America to the Middle East and India, the polar winds have in effect caused the Sahara and other deserts to reach farther to the south. Paradoxically, the same vortex has created quite different weather quirks in the U.S. and other temperate zones. As the winds swirl around the globe, their southerly portions undulate like the bottom of a skirt. Cold air is pulled down across the Western U.S. and warm air is swept up to the Northeast. The collision of air masses of widely differing temperatures and humidity can create violent storms—the Midwest’s recent rash of disastrous tornadoes, for example.
“University of Toronto Climatologist Kenneth Hare, a former president of the Royal Meteorological Society, believes that the continuing drought and the recent failure of the Russian harvest gave the world a grim premonition of what might happen. Warns Hare: ‘I don’t believe that the world’s present population is sustainable if there are more than three years like 1972 in a row.’”
In 1991 members of a highly respected international think tank which included leading scientists, political advisors, former politicians, philosophers and many other influential bureaucrats, co-authored a report titled “The First Global Revolution” (ISBN 0-671-71107-5). The International Club of Rome’s report came up with recommendations to help globalisation along. The cold war united capitalists states and united the other communist half of the world. The goal for the report was to bring these two together. Under the threat of war people work together and accept cohesive measures if it is claimed to be for the “greater good”. It concluded that a war type mindset would help create globalised governance but they needed a new enemy not involving traditional warfare to allow for society to change it’s attitudes towards being world citizens rather than nationalistic. The report states, “in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
During the 70’s while the wealthy Time Magazine was giving coverage to global cooling and scientists who said the “world’s present population” is not “sustainable” this same highly respected international think tank published the report “Reshaping the International Order” (ISBN 0-525-04340-3) which highlighted the propaganda to be pushed for their agenda. It sated, “although not yet proven, climatologists are being forced to conclude that our planet has in recent times passed through a period which may well have been optimal as far as food production is concerned.”
Do you think these think tanks are thinking for the common public or for the people who own the globe’s wealth? These think tanks are an important part of human resources.
Don’t have misconceptions that believing in global warming will end traditional conflicts on the road to full global governance. In fact while the belief in the threat unifies minds of the homogenised world master political manipulators will use climate change for wars in the un-homogenised parts of the world, and the climate has never stopped changing. The Boston Globe, July 21 2009: “WASHINGTON — Massive crop devastation, melting glaciers, water shortages, millions of displaced people — all of these will drag the US military into conflict if global climate change goes unchecked, a Senate panel was warned today. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, convened by Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, focused on what so far has received only modest attention in the climate change debate: the effect it is bound to have on national defense. From Africa to the Middle East and South Asia, dramatic changes in the weather will stress already unstable nations, creating what Gunn called ‘climate conflicts.’ ‘International conflicts over resources, due to migrants, and/or as a means of distraction are not only likely,’ he added, ‘but likely to exacerbate the underlying climate change problem.’ Kerry, since he took the helm of the committee earlier this year, has made addressing climate change a top priority.”
He who owns the gold makes the rules
I’d elaborate on that old expression to those that control massive amounts of wealth share many of the same goals, speak and corporate with each other for their greater good. Do the large captains of industry steer industrialised civilization? We can certainty see that with the capital put behind the decades old idea that the weather and a high-standard-of-living for the common public are the enemies of humanity.
The captains at the top plan decades in advance – 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 year plans. One of the unelected United Nations’ 40 year plans reported by the Daily Mail, 8th of October 2008: “Prime Minister Gordon Brown hailed ‘major progress’ after the leaders of the G8 today vowed to halve world emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050. More than 80 Labour MPs are calling for the Government to cut CO2 emissions by 2050 by as much as 80 per cent instead of the agreed 60 per cent. European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the agreement constituted a ‘new, shared vision by the major economies’ that would support the UN-led effort on a new global warming accord.”
EU Lisbon Treaty (TEU), article 2(h): “The Union shall define and pursue common policies and actions, and shall work for a high degree of cooperation in all fields of international relations, in order to: promote an international system based on stronger multilateral cooperation and good global governance.”
EU Lisbon Treaty (TEU), article 208.2: “The Union and the Member States shall comply with the commitments and take account of the objectives they have approved in the context of the United Nations and other competent international organisations.”
Keep digging and you’ll find what the dusty past has to offer
Thomas R Malthus hailed as a genius by economists such as John Maynard Keynes (who setup our current economic system) and the “pioneer” of social sciences also inspired Charles Darwin’s theory of “survival of the fittest”, “eat-or-be-eaten” to create the better breed.
In 1798 Malthus wrote his famous essay the Principle of Population. His statistics dazzled the upper literate class. He stated that human population increases geometrical at the rate of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 while human produced food supply only increased at the rate of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Numbers don’t lie even if they are made up. As long as the statistician is capable of basic arithmetic the numbers will always add up. Malthus like a good statistician picked his numbers to suite his belief. He did not have any population data. The first population count did not take place in Britain until 1801 and one census does not show a population growth trend. The next census was not until 1811. Of course he also could not have possibly known how much land in all of Britain might or might not be fertile. It is interesting to note that Malthus fable on goats and dogs that inspired Darwin is as feeble to the thinking mind without an agenda or a particular belief system to reinforce.
Malthus was an advocate of eradicating poverty and raising awareness among the public about his theory of overpopulation. He published the following in the sixth edition of his essay:
“Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marsh and unwholesome situations. But above all, we should reprobate [condemn/censure] specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders”
If people believe in the benefit of the group (bunch of individuals) over the individual for the “greater good” then people can be lead to do absolutely anything for what they are told the “greater good” is. This is the mass mind, the human resource to be utilised for any agenda.